• About This Site
  • Archives
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
  • Topics
    • Campaign Coverage
    • Trump and the Coronavirus
    • The New York Times
    • False Equivalence
    • Getting Played
    • Covering Race
    • Anonymous Sources
    • Horse-Race Journalism
    • Fact-Checking
    • Advocacy
    • Context
    • Timidity
    • Interviewing Voters
    • Politics as Entertainment
    • Best Practices
    • Labels
    • After Trump
  • Donate
Sign in
Welcome!Log into your account
Forgot your password?
Password recovery
Recover your password
Search
Press Watch
Press Watch
An intervention for political journalism
Press Watch
Press Watch
An intervention for political journalism
  • About This Site
  • Archives
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
  • Topics
    • Campaign Coverage
    • Trump and the Coronavirus
    • The New York Times
    • False Equivalence
    • Getting Played
    • Covering Race
    • Anonymous Sources
    • Horse-Race Journalism
    • Fact-Checking
    • Advocacy
    • Context
    • Timidity
    • Interviewing Voters
    • Politics as Entertainment
    • Best Practices
    • Labels
    • After Trump
  • Donate
More

    Fact-Checking

    • Advocacy
    • After Trump
    • Anonymous Sources
    • Best Practices
    • Campaign Coverage
    • Context
    • Covering Race
    • Explainers
    • Fact-Checking
    • False Equivalence
    • Getting Played
    • Horse-Race Journalism
    • Interviewing Voters
    • Labels
    • New York Times
    • Objectivity
    • Politics as Entertainment
    • The Biden Presidency
    • The Capitol Siege
    • This Is Not Normal
    • Timidity
    • Trump and the Coronavirus
    • Worst Practices

      Fact-checking needs to make way for reality-testing and gaslighting-fighting

      October 28, 2019 9:54 am EDT
      © 2020 by Dan Froomkin. Interested in reprinting any material from this site? Get in touch.