The leaders of our elite newsrooms had a whole year to figure out how they were going to frame Rush Limbaughâs life.
He announced he was dying of lung cancer last February, right before Donald Trump gave him the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nationâs highest civilian honor. It was a striking moment, symbolic of how thoroughly Limbaughâs moral rot had infected the body politic, all the way to the presidency and its most hallowed traditions.
In the ensuing months, even the most stubbornly aloof mainstream news organizations began to publicly acknowledge Trump as a liar, a failure, a loser, and an inciter of division and violence.
But calling out the hatred and bigotry that are now firmly established as the central tenets of the modern Republican Party remains a step too far. Our newsroom leaders still cannot bring themselves to declare that the hysteria and conspiracy theories that once inhabited only the lunatic fringes of our political discourse â until Rush Limbaugh, and then Donald Trump, came along â donât merit respect, but banishment, rejection, and denial.
And that is why, even with a year to prewrite and edit, major media outlets on Wednesday published obituaries celebrating Limbaughâs extraordinary success as a âconservative provocateur.â They whitewashed his once-unimaginably vile and divisive demagoguery as âcomic bombast.â They hailed him as âthe voice of American conservatism,â when what really matters about Rush Limbaugh is that he spread hatred more effectively and lucratively than any American before him. He didnât hide his bigotry, and, thanks to him, neither, eventually, did the Republican Party.
Even if you are trying to avoid hyperbole, itâs not hard to come up with a top for a defensible Limbaugh obit. You could write something like:
He pushed the national political discourse far to the right, giving voice to racism, misogyny and conspiracy theories that became central to the rise of Trump and the radicalization of the Republican Party.
Heck, you could simply publish some of the horrible things he said, fairly high up in the story.
But instead, too many mainstream-media obituaries reflected admiration for the guy, starting with the headlines.
Rush Limbaugh, conservative radio provocateur and cultural phenomenon, dies at 70, proclaimed the Washington Post. Veteran reporter Marc Fisher wrote that Limbaugh âdeployed comic bombast and relentless bashing of liberals, feminists and environmentalists to become the nationâs most popular radio talk-show host and lead the Republican Party into a politics of anger and obstruction.â
As Daily Beast media reporter Max Tani tweeted: âi imagine many people did not find the bombast to be comical.â No kidding.
Fisher basically subscribed to Limbaughâs own assessment of his achievements:
He saw himself as a teacher, polemicist, media critic and GOP strategist, but above all as an entertainer and salesman. Mr. Limbaugh mocked Democrats and liberals, touted a traditional Midwestern, moralistic patriotism and presented himself on the air as a biting but jovial know-it-all who pontificated âwith half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair,â as he often said.
Fisher euphemistically described Limbaughâs grotesque villainization of his political enemies as âdemonizing liberals and pushing conservative elected officials to hard lines on issues such as immigration, government spending and denial of global warming.â
And he belittled Limbaughâs critics as humorless:
Although critics of the show spent decades decrying it as offensive, even cruel, his fans defended Mr. Limbaughâs insults as more funny than slashing. He won attention from far beyond his radio audience with barbs aimed at gays; Blacks; liberals; feminists, whom he sometimes called âfeminazisâ; and environmentalists, whom he derided as âtree-huggers.â
The Associated Press obituary, by Matt Sedensky, due to appear in countless newspapers, was headlined Rush Limbaugh, âvoice of American conservatism,â has died. (That was the APâs own characterization, despite the quote marks. The story quoted Ronald Reagan calling him âthe number one voice for conservatism,â which is a bit different.)Â The lead paragraph was effusive:
Rush Limbaugh, the talk radio host who ripped into liberals and laid waste to political correctness with a gleeful malice that made him one of the most powerful voices in politics, influencing the rightward push of American conservatism and the rise of Donald Trump, died Wednesday. He was 70.
So was the third:
Unflinchingly conservative, wildly partisan, bombastically self-promoting and larger than life, Limbaugh galvanized listeners for more than 30 years with his talent for sarcastic, insult-laced commentary.
So was the eighth:
Limbaugh took as a badge of honor the title âmost dangerous man in America.â He said he was the âtruth detector,â the âdoctor of democracy,â a âlover of mankind,â a âharmless, lovable little fuzz ballâ and an âall-around good guy.â He claimed he had âtalent on loan from God.â
It wasnât until the ninth paragraph that you read about Limbaugh calling his enemies âfeminazisâ and âfaggots.â Â It wasnât until the tenth that you got a taste of his incredible cruelty:
When actor Michael J. Fox, suffering from Parkinsonâs disease, appeared in a Democratic campaign commercial, Limbaugh mocked his tremors. When a Washington advocate for the homeless killed himself, he cracked jokes. As the AIDS epidemic raged in the 1980s, he made the dying a punchline. He called 12-year-old Chelsea Clinton a dog.
Even then, the article only referred to âaccusationsâ of bigotry and racism â until, way down toward the end, there was an indication of his real legacy, from a critic, of course:
âWhat he did was to bring a paranoia and really mean, nasty rhetoric and hyperpartisanship into the mainstream,â said Martin Kaplan, a University of Southern California professor who is an expert on the intersection of politics and entertainment and a frequent critic of Limbaugh. âThe kind of antagonism and vituperativeness that characterized him instantly became acceptable everywhere.â
At NPR, David Folkenflikâs obit anemically referred to Limbaugh as a âconservative broadcaster⌠who entertained millions and propelled waves of Republican politicians.â
Maybe some news organizations were caught by surprise — although I donât know how that could be.
At the Los Angeles Times, the original obituary describing Limbaugh as a âcontroversial and widely influential conservative radio personality,â was eventually updated, with Dorany Pineda noting Limbaughâs sway over Republican leaders and concluding that âIn ways both big and small, it was Limbaugh who arose as the architect of the deep political and cultural divides in America that came into full focus during the Trump era.â
The first version of the obituary posted by the New York Times, by Robert McFadden was dramatically revised three or four hours later, with the additional byline of media writer Michael Grynbaum. The headline calling Limbaugh âTalk Radioâs Conservative Provocateurâ was changed to say that he had âTurned Talk Radio Into a Right-Wing Attack Machine.â Limbaugh was no longer âa divisive darling of the right,â thank goodness. Instead, the Times wrote:
He became a singular figure in the American media, fomenting mistrust, grievances and even hatred on the right for Americans who did not share their views, and he pushed baseless claims and toxic rumors long before Twitter and Reddit became havens for such disinformation. In politics, he was not only an ally of Mr. Trump but also a precursor, combining media fame, right-wing scare tactics and over-the-top showmanship to build an enormous fan base and mount attacks on truth and facts.
His conspiracy theories ranged from baldfaced lies about Barack Obamaâs birthplace â the president âhas yet to have to prove that heâs a citizen,â he said falsely in 2009 â to claims that Mr. Obamaâs 2009 health care bill would empower âdeath panelsâ and âeuthanizeâ elderly Americans. In the wake of last yearâs election, he amplified Mr. Trumpâs groundless claims of voter fraud; on President Bidenâs Inauguration Day, during one of his final broadcasts, he insisted to listeners that the new administration had ânot legitimately won it.â
But even that was euphemistic. For the real story, you had to read Nick Robins-Early and Christopher Mathiasâs obituary on HuffPost, running under the headline âRush Limbaugh, Bigoted King Of Talk Radio, Dies At 70.â
They made an overwhelming case in support of the headline:
Once, after arguing with a Black man who called into his show, he told the caller to âtake that bone out of your nose and call me back.â Another time, Limbaugh asked his audience, âHave you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?â while discussing the Black civil rights activist and politician. Limbaugh once ludicrously asserted that âif any race of people should not have guilt about slavery, itâs Caucasians.â He invited a guest on air who sang âBarack, the Magic Negroâ to the tune of âPuff, the Magic Dragon.â In 2016, he read an essay on air that had been penned by a well-known white supremacist.
Limbaughâs radio career was also one long exercise in misogyny, perhaps best summed up by his thesis that âfeminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society.â
Nearly every marginalized group or minority bore the brunt of Limbaughâs bigotry. Once, while speaking about the genocide of Americaâs indigenous peoples, Limbaugh said, âHolocaust 90 million Indians? Only 4 million left? They all have casinos, whatâs to complain about?â
Limbaugh frequently mirrored white nationalist talking points when discussing Latino immigrants, whom he described as lazy and dependent on the government. He called migrants at Americaâs southern border an âinvasion.â
An opponent of marriage equality â which he suggested was âpervertedâ and âdepravedâ â Limbaugh argued in 2016 that legalizing gay marriage would lead to bestiality. âWhat happens if you love your dog?â he said. He once referred to transgender people as being mentally ill.
Throughout the 1980s and â90s, Limbaugh also frequently denigrated those who were HIV positive, saying the best way to stop the spread of the virus was to ânot ask another man to bend over and make love at the exit point.â He spoke out against federal funding to fight the virus too, calling it the âonly federally protected virus.â
Thereâs no denying Limbaugh was a giant, and that his life makes a helluva story. But his legacy is not a media empire, itâs his extraordinary influence on the rise of far-right, white-supremacist, reality-denying, nationalism. He, as much as anyone, brought us Trump, the constant lying, the virulent racism and misogyny, the hostility toward governing, the corruption, and ultimately Covid denialism and insurrection.
The Limbaugh obituaries are a good test of whether mainstream news organizations are ready to call out the radical, hate-filled hysteria that pre-existed and survives Trump, or whether they are going to go back to normalizing it. The early signs are not good.
The alleged “bone” comment is sourced at MSNBC. MSNBC sources it at FAIR. But the FAIR link does not show any comment like that.
Source checks out: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rush-limbaugh-racist-quotes/
Itâs pretty clear youâve never listened to the Rush Limbaugh show. Furthermore, itâs also pretty clear that you just found quotes that supported your position despite the context.
One good example is the Michael J. Fox quote. Mr. Fox had stated once that he had stopped taking his medication before appearing to testify at a hearing so that people would understand what it was like to have Parkinsonâs. Mr. Limbaugh wondered whether Mr. Fox had done the same thing at his congressional testimony. A perfectly reasonable question.
Yeah, no. https://twitter.com/SageRosenfels18/status/1224902092457943041
Seriously? Sorry you didnât like the guy. Maybe you should just not have listened to his show. He had 16 million listeners a week in a country of 350 million but this idiot âjournalistsâ is shaking in his flip flops because all he sees is the Antichrist. How to liberal morons like this navigate life being terrified of everything?
Once again the Times refuses to say that Limbaugh pushed one of the most vile slanders against a politician I have ever seen â that the Clintonâs had their good friend Vince Foster murdered. Accusing Obama of being born in Kenya was bad (also stupid because he would have been a US citizen anyway since his mother was one) but being accused of murder is as vicious and dishonest as it gets. Many people, including ones in my extended family believed that lie. It shouldnât have surprised the media that they would also believe Hillary runs a pedophile ring. In her interview on Hillaryâs new podcast, Nancy Pelosi said that the Vince Foster lie was where Republicans really went off the deep end. Too bad the media at that time didnât treat it as the insane and outrageous slander that it was.
Even worse than the sanitized obits was the way the mainstream media treated Rush as a respected voice of conservatism from the beginning instead of treating Rush as the odious person he clearly was, deliberately causing deep damage to our democracy with his lies and divisiveness. I once watched Tim Russert ask Rush about the lies he regularly told. Limbaugh used his âIâm just an entertainerâ excuse and Tim let it go. Tim later was a guest on Rushâs show where he fawned over Rush, telling him it was a honor to be his guest. Then there was Katie Couric:
â…..during her first week in the anchor chair at CBS, Couric personally contacted Limbaugh and asked him to contribute a âFree Speechâ segment for her nightly newscast. âFree Speechâ is where outsiders are invited to tape op-eds and is touted by CBS as a forum to restore âcivil discourse.â â
https://www.mediamatters.org/rush-limbaugh/playing-nice-rush-limbaugh
Our mainstream media has done deep damage to our democracy by treating people like Rush, Newt, Bannon, and even Trump when he was running as if they are people who believe in this country, not as the anti-democracy plutocrats and theocrats that they clearly are.
By the way I have been unable to get my posts accepted at this site because I had the cross-tracking blocker on. I bet a lot of people are having that problem.
Sir, you are not describing Rush Limbaugh, you are describing your hateful, bigoted self.
Good article. âMoral rotâ is on target.